PAPERS Resources

AAR Annual Meeting
Boston, MA
November 18-21, 2017

2017 Annual Meeting Program (PDF)

Preliminary 2017 Annual Meeting Program (MS Word)

To return to the Welcome Page, please click here.

For questions or support, email support@aarweb.org.

To return to the AAR website, click here.

Wesleyan Studies Unit

Statement of Purpose: 

This Unit seeks to promote the critical understanding and appropriation of Wesleyan traditions. Our sessions are purposefully structured to encourage not only historical/sociological studies, but also theological reflection, critique, and extension. We understand Wesleyan traditions to include Methodist, Holiness, and other related strands of Christian tradition.

Call for Papers: 

We are calling for papers in the first session proposed below and we plan to invite a panel for the second session proposed:

• Methodism and Nationalism. The year 2017 marks the centennial of the United States’ entry into World War I. The response of Methodists in the USA to the “Great War” was contested. While the Methodist Episcopal Church established a national war council in Washington, pastors who sought to cool down the patriotic fervor found their churches painted yellow. We call for papers examining the intersections of Methodism and nationalism. As examples, papers might explore the Wesley’s views on patriotism, views on war and Christian pacifism in the Methodist family, and the relationship between Wesleyan/Methodist identities and national narratives in the United States or other parts of the world.

• Wesleyan Ecclesiologies. In response to a draft document on ecclesiology entitled, “Wonder, Hope, and Love” offered by the Faith and Order Commission of The United Methodist Church and commended for study by the denomination’s 2016 General Conference, we will invite panelists from a variety of church backgrounds to respond to this theological statement in the light of the Word Council of Churches Faith and Order Statement, The Church: Towards a Common Vision (2014), which is referred to in the UM document. [NB: This will be an invited panel, and we are not calling for paper proposals in this area.]

Method: 
PAPERS
Process: 
Proposer names are visible to chairs but anonymous to steering committee members
Comments: 
We followed standard AAR procedures to insure blind review of the paper proposals. Co-chairs were able to access demographic information to inform the steering committee about issues of representation without revealing names of proposers. This did not end up being a significant factor in our eventual selections.
Leadership: 
ChairSteering Committee