Program Unit In-person November Annual Meeting 2026

Anthropology of Religion Unit

Call for Proposals

We invite proposals using anthropological theories and methods to explore diverse traditions, regions, topics, periods, and standpoints from across the discipline. The steering committee has identified the following areas to be of particular interest for individual and panel submissions in 2026:

  • Critical Ethnographies of Time and Temporalities: With this year’s presidential theme being “Future/s”, we invite papers that seek to theorize, problematize, and otherwise critically examine how different religions conceive of time and its movement(-s). This might include ethnographic examinations of how time and time scales are imagined, such as “deep histories” and “deep futures”; the religious affects (hope, sorrow, etc.) that shape how people reckon with and relate to time; and/or the distinct techniques and practices that religious actors use to engage with times other than the present (e.g., memorialization, divination, prophecy, etc.)  

  • (Un-)Orthodoxies: This panel invites papers exploring persistence and perhaps increasing appeal of religious groups that label themselves as “orthodox.” This panel invites papers examining the seemingly contradictory appeal of Orthodox movements and theologies across Judaism, Christianity, Islam, and other traditions. How do self-described orthodox religions define themselves in relation to or against other forms of fundamentalist, conservative, or illiberal theologies? What do ethnographic approaches reveal about what makes orthodoxy an appealing epistemic stance in the contemporary world? How might a comparative approach to studying orthodoxy(-ies) help us better understand religion in the contemporary world?   

  • Global Philosophies of Religion beyond the Text: In collaboration with the Global-Critical Philosophy of Religion Unit  and the Indian and Chinese Religions in Dialogue Unit, we seek to sponsor a panel engaging with non-textual and non-Western sources for the philosophy of religion. Papers should consider forms of lived religious reasoning, argumentation, or enactment from sources other than texts, such as oral traditions, rituals, performances, arts, etc. We imagine papers that explore “philosophies from below,” including non-hegemonic and marginalized systems of knowledge, indigenous ways of knowing, conspiracy and other forms of stigmatized knowledge, peripheral epistemologies, etc., and which treat those forms of knowledge as valuable resources for cross-cultural inquiries in the philosophy of religion.

  • Pre-Organized Panels. In keeping with our mission to present the strongest and most innovative work in the anthropology of religion, we also welcome proposals for fully formed panels on topics other than those outlined above. Ideally, such panels will focus on a topic of special interest to anthropologists, and be composed of scholars whose perspectives and levels of expertise complement (rather than replicate) each others’. Further, we encourage proposals that use creative and alternative formats that elevate critical dialogue.
Statement of Purpose

This Unit draws together scholars who utilize the methodological tools and theoretical perspectives of anthropology in the study of religion as a social and cultural phenomenon. Given the increasing importance of anthropology and ethnography for the academic study of religion, we serve the academy as an important forum for sustained discussion and critique of anthropological approaches that can connect scholars working on diverse traditions, regions, and eras who otherwise might not have the opportunity to learn from each other. Interested members are encouraged to join our (low volume) list-serv: https://aarlists.org/

Chair Mail Dates
Brendan Jamal Thornton brendan_thornton@unc.edu - View
Eric Hoenes Del Pinal ehoenes@uncc.edu - View
Steering Member Mail Dates
Alyson Prude mprude13@hotmail.com - View
Candace Lukasik c.lukasik@msstate.edu - View
Hanna H. Kim hannakim@adelphi.edu - View
Lauren Leve lgleve@unc.edu - View
Sam Shuman, University of Virginia sashuman@virginia.edu - View
Sarah Tobin sarah.tobin@cmi.no - View
Review Process: Participant names are anonymous to chairs and steering committee members during review, but visible to chairs prior to final acceptance/rejection
This process has served us well. Blind review allows us to select the most well-formed proposals without biasing decisions towards recognized names in the field.