American Buddhist Tradition: The work of the Tibetan Preliminary Practices

This paper takes up the well-worn debate over Buddhist modernism from the perspective of its neglected shadow: Buddhist tradition. Can contemporary American Buddhists ever be “traditional” (as opposed to merely “traditionalistic”)? What would that mean? Based on ongoing ethnographic interviews, participant observation, and liturgical analysis, I argue that the Tibetan Buddhist preliminary practices (ngondro) work to form Buddhist subjects with a visceral sense of tradition, binding together cosmologies, bodily postures, ethical commitments, emotional habits, and sacralized relationships. This “tradition” is neither an ahistorical essence already out there in the world nor a rhetorical posture batting ineffectually at the rupture of modernity: it is one possible outcome of human labor and desire. For American converts engaged in the preliminary practices, both tradition and modernity are live orientations, ways of being in the world in a fraught and often tragic relationship to one another.