When Readings Make Routines: Mark 9:29, Coercive Fasting, and Child Safeguarding Beyond Paternalism

This paper examines the role of Mark 9, particularly when reception becomes routine. In such contexts, interpretive escalation—characterised by increased prayer and fasting—is often perceived as an expression of faithfulness, even when it results in physical consequences for minors. Through comparative analysis of examples from the UK, Nigeria, and Kenya, I identify recurring pathways of harm, including claims of authority that exceed accountability, consent asymmetries that are spiritualized as obedience, and cycles of escalation where distress is interpreted as a sign that further intensification is required. I contend that the phrase “prayer-and-fasting” from Mark 9:29 functions as a travelling gloss with significant safeguarding implications, while the shorter version (“by prayer”) can serve as a limiting resource in practices involving children. Finally, I propose theological “red lines” for individuals under 18 and advocate for care pathways—encompassing pediatric, psychological, and safeguarding measures—as progressive alternatives to paternalistic protection models.