This paper argues that women’s ordination in Methodist and Wesleyan traditions cannot be explained by theology or “progress” narratives alone; it must also be read through the machinery of polity that governs visibility, authority, and institutional memory. Using the Methodist Episcopal Church’s 1920 General Conference as a focused case, I show how women translated biblical interpretation into rule-text through a canon → script → policy infrastructure through reading communities, movement press, petition packets, and conference-savvy coalition work while official minutes and indexing practices compressed authorship and debate. I then extend this framework through comparative snapshots from two worldwide Methodist/Wesleyan contexts to demonstrate recurring gatekeeping mechanisms (committee routing, agenda control, credentialing, archival visibility) and the counter-moves women employed to sustain advocacy across decades. Reframing conferencing and print cultures as sites of lived theology clarifies how ordination becomes thinkable and why “stained-glass ceilings” persist.
Attached Paper
Online June Annual Meeting 2026
Minutes, Memorials, and Movements: Women’s Ordination and the Machinery of Methodist Polity
Papers Session: Women's Ordination in Worldwide Wesleyan Traditions
Abstract for Online Program Book (maximum 150 words)
