In-person November Annual Meeting 2025 Program Book
All time are listed in Eastern Time Zone.
This session explores the enduring influence of mimetic theory in interpreting both interpersonal conflict and contemporary literature. The first paper engages Stephen Karpman’s “Drama Triangle” alongside René Girard’s theories of desire and opposition, showing how the recurring roles of Persecutor, Victim, and Rescuer in conflict mirror cinematic portrayals of heroism and villainy. By placing Girard in dialogue with conflict psychology and film, the paper suggests that Christian nonviolence offers a counter-narrative to the moral scripts of popular media. The second paper turns to the fiction of Michel Houellebecq, whose novel Submission critiques and yet unwittingly enacts key Girardian insights. Though Houellebecq's narrator dismisses mimetic theory, his fiction reveals characters caught in webs of triangular desire, grappling with the consequences of secularization and political fatigue. Together, these papers offer fresh perspectives on how mimetic patterns shape both our cultural imagination and our understanding of conflict, desire, and ethical possibility.
Papers
Psychologist Stephen Karpman argued that people in interpersonal conflicts tend to perform roles: the Persecutor, the Victim, and the Rescuer. This threefold framework structures interactions and simplifies the conflict, often making conflict resolution more difficult. Karpman modeled this "Drama Triangle" on cinematic and theatrical roles, and we can see the resonances between real-world conflict behavior and the depictions of heroes, villains, and innocent would-be victims in popular media. Writing concurrently with Karpman, René Girard made a similar argument about how would-be heroes and villains are locked in relationships of opposition and dependence. This way of framing conflict pervades popular film, and by putting Girard, film studies, and conflict psychology into conversation, we get a clearer picture on the power that the hero-villain-victim picture has over our moral imaginations. The tradition of Christian nonviolence offers a non-heroic approach to ethics in situations of conflict.
This paper treats Girardian themes in the fiction of the French novelist, Michel Houellebecq, considered one of the leading voices in contemporary European fiction. Unlike Jean-Paul Sartre, who famously declared "Hell is other people," for Houellebecq hell seems to be the individual left to his (almost always his for Houellebecq) own devices.
Long a curiosity to Girardians, Houellbecq's most recent novel, Annihilation, takes up the claims of Girard, especially regarding mimetic or triangular desire, and rejects them wholesale: "Amusing on paper, the theory is in fact false." (p. 335). This paper argues that Houellebecq's portrayal of mediated desire in the main character, Paul Raison, contradicts the narrator's own claims. In addition, it highlights how Houellebecq's insights, while not exactly "novelistic" in the Girardian sense, incarnate several central themes in mimetic theory. These include his understanding of politics, the limits of secularization, and the history of French literature
This session brings mimetic theory into dialogue with theology, pedagogy, and contemporary theories of identity to explore how desire shapes personal and communal formation. The first paper presents a pedagogical framework for teaching the lives of the saints in Catholic religious education, emphasizing the saints’ conversion of desire as a model for adolescent development. Drawing on Girard’s theory of mimetic desire, positive mimesis, and affective conversion, it proposes ways educators can invite students to critically reflect on their own desires through figures like St. Ignatius of Loyola. The second paper engages queer and crip theologies alongside mimetic theory to critique the limits of rigid identity categories. While queer and crip perspectives challenge binaries, mimetic theory reveals how such categories can still participate in cycles of exclusion and violence. Together, these papers explore alternative models of identity grounded not in rivalry or social comparison, but in openness to divine and transformative desire.
The devil, the figure styled by John Calvin as “God’s enemy and ours,” is ubiquitous in the witness of the New Testament, but contemporary Christian doctrine generally remains dumbfounded about what to do with him. At the same time, modern impulses have yielded a resurgence in the language of the “demonic”—that is, pervasive, pernicious, personified evil. In light of this perplexity, Philip G. Ziegler raises and seeks to answer a pointed question in his book God's Adversary and Ours: Can the gospel actually be heard and understood without meaningful reference to this inimical entity?
This panel will discuss Ziegler's cautious but determined biblical-theological exploration of the identity, ontology, and agency of the devil.
.
You're invited to our annual Connecting Conversations Luncheon! The PWD Committee is thrilled to host this special event, a cherished tradition that has always provided a valuable space for our members with disabilities and their allies in the Academy to connect and build community.
This year, we're making a small change to the format. Instead of a paid meal, we'll be hosting a Bring Your Own Lunch (BYOL) event. Whether you bring your own lunch or not, please join us! We believe the most important part of this gathering is the conversation and connection.
If you have any questions, please contact the PWD chair, Nick Shrubsole, at Nicholas.Shrubsole@ucf.edu.
The Society for the Study of Chinese Religions is hosting an annual Roundtable of Emerging Voices in the Study of Chinese Religions at the American Academy of Religions. Participants are Ph.D. students or early career scholars in Chinese Religions who will present their current research.
Papers
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Status of Women and Gender Minoritized Persons in the Professions Committee and The Committee on Racial and Ethnic Minorities in the Professions Committee invite all woman-identified and gender-minoritized AAR members at any stage in their professions to Mentoring Tables for self-reflective, critical, and supportive conversations. The Mentoring Tables event offers space for candid conversations about challenging issues the participants are facing due to their social identities, institutional culture, political climate, and more. Intended as peer-to-peer mentoring in a supportive environment, table conversations include, but are not limited to, academic freedom, scholarship, non-academic careers, research and publication, job search, professional development, social identity-related issues in professions, and graduate schools.
Unlike previous years, meals will not be available for this event, but light snacks and refreshments will be provided. If you prefer to bring your own lunch, feel free to do so. No reservation is required.
In an era of faculty precarity, ideological polarization, and institutional histories of injustice, what does it mean to practice hope as an intellectual and political commitment? What strategies and choices make hope and freedom viable? This panel explores hope not as naïve optimism, but as a form of sovereignty—a declaration of intellectual and ethical autonomy as well as accountability—in the face of everyday structural constraints, implicit and explicit (and old and new) hierarchies, censorship and surveillance, and professional vulnerability.
Join us for a discussion on 'In God's Presence: A Theological Reintroduction to Judaism' by Alon Goshen-Gottstein. A fireside chat featuring two theologians – Jon Levenson of Harvard University (Jewish) and David Ford of Cambridge University (Christian) will consider how this novel theological reading of Judaism's history and spirituality can shed new light and inspire mutual understanding for Jews and Christians. Goshen-Gottstein’s book, the fruit of a lifetime of study and spiritual practice, offers a framework for understanding Judaism for both the insider and the outsider. Painting a composite picture of Judaism from its beginnings until today, Goshen-Gottstein draws on history, literature, theology, spirituality, and practiced religious life to craft an overview in which these different parts are appreciated as pieces of a larger whole.