In-person November Annual Meeting 2025 Program Book

All time are listed in Eastern Time Zone.

Please note that this schedule is subject to change and is currently being updated. Please excuse our appearance as we finalize the schedule. If you have any questions, please contact annualmeeting@aarweb.org.
Monday, 12:30 PM - 2:30 PM | Sheraton, Stuart (Third Floor) Session ID: A24-207
Papers Session

This panel provides a pioneering contribution to the emerging fields of research on emotions and Chinese religion by exploring emotive facets of religious experience, including their impact on self-cultivation, elite discourse, and devotional practices such as pilgrimage. Paper #1 examines these issues at an individual level, with a case study of an accomplished visual artist and musician who became a Buddhist monk at mid-life and entered a distinctively different community of emotions. The panel’s second paper explores the profound significance of humor for an emotional community of Chinese elites who directed laughter of derision at female spirit mediums. Paper #3 treats emotional communities of Hakka families that experience the joys of going on pilgrimage together to a Guanyin temple in northern Taiwan, while the panel’s final paper assesses the emotive aspects of pilgrimage in communities of men and women who worship the Goddess of Mount Tai.

Papers

When accomplished visual artists join the monastic Order in Buddhist China (and thus enter a new “community of emotions”), is there room for continued expression of emotions through artistic engagement? Abundant primary sources enable granular study of Hongyi (1880-1942), a notably accomplished man of the arts who became a monk at age thirty-eight. Here we will consider complex issues related to emotions, discipline, and creative activities through examination of: (1) the eminent monk Yinguang’s written teachings to Hongyi in the 1920s about calligraphy (including blood writing) and its procedures in monastic contexts; (2) the witness of Hongyi’s sustained body of visual work created in this new context - what he actually created (and why), as well as what he no longer created; and (3) after he came to maturity as a Vinaya master, Hongyi’s cautionary yet encouraging statements and teachings regarding the role of artistic expression within a monastic vocation.

This paper contributes to research on emotions and Chinese religion by examining the laughter of derision directed at female spirit mediums. These women occupy an ambiguous role in Chinese historical texts. Some accounts depict them as vital intermediaries who communicate with the unseen for the benefit of local communities, while others condemn them as charlatans who undermine social morality. The article analyzes the literary trope of mocking female mediums in three stages: from the Han dynasty, through the late imperial period, and into the Maoist era. Through their derisive laughter at female mediums, Chinese elites crafted narratives about civilization, modernization, and revolution. Yet even as these women became objects of ridicule, their portrayal in elite writings inadvertently reveals their crucial role in local religious life. The power dynamics of laugher offer important insights into the intersections of gender, emotion, and politics in Chinese religious history.

This paper explores the emotional facets of Hakka pilgrimage practices at a temple to the bodhisattva Guanyin 觀音 situated on the outskirts of the town Daxi 大溪in northern Taiwan. Its analytical framework draws on Tuan Yi-fu’s concept of “topophilia” (defined as “the affective bond between people and place or setting”) to hypothesize that sacred sites like the Guanyin Temple lie at the heart of what I tentatively term a “cultural nexus of feelings” featuring the moving experience of journeying on pilgrimage accompanied by family members along paths trodden by one’s ancestors that inspire memories of individual lives and family histories. Thus, worshippers at the Guanyin Temple experience feelings of well-being due to its serving as a ritual and affective venue for coping with life’s challenges, while also joining with family members to enjoy time together and recall memories from their childhood or stories told by their forebears.

This paper explores how the affective aspects of reciprocity in the deity-human relationship are essential to understanding the vitality of pilgrimage practices in the cult of the Goddess of Mount Tai. Inspired by Monique Scheer’s use of practice theory in the history of emotions and Barbara Rosewein’s work on emotional communities, this paper explores how exhortations about pilgrimage practices in three widely circulated baojuan 寶卷(precious scrolls) shape what devotees do and feel. I showcase how these texts use the word gandong 感動 (stimulate and move) to depict the Goddess as physically stimulated and emotionally moved by her devotees’ prayers, and propose to appropriate the indigenous notion of gandong as an interpretive lens to capture an intimate deity-human relationship unmediated by the impersonal, metaphysical correlation of cosmos and virtue.

Respondent

Monday, 12:30 PM - 2:30 PM | Hynes Convention Center, 105 (Plaza… Session ID: A24-215
Papers Session

Since the early 20th century, biblical inerrancy served fundamentalists as a theological litmus test. In the 1970s, conservative evangelical leaders declared a “Battle for the Bible” against both liberal Protestants and moderates in their own ranks. A crucial but understudied part of this theological consolidation and its legacy in the New Christian Right was the work of the International Council on Biblical Inerrancy (ICBI). From 1978 to 1986, the ICBI gathered evangelicals to sign the Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy then Statements on Biblical Hermeneutics and Biblical Application and also helped sponsor the 1982 Congress on the Bible. The ICBI’s publications are important windows into American evangelicalism during its existence. Research into the participants in ICBI efforts and the ICBI archives offers further insights into evangelical theology, politics, and culture. These four papers are a first step toward expanding scholarly analysis of the ICBI and its impact on American evangelicalism.

Papers

This paper examines the conservative political influence of the International Council on Biblical Inerrancy (ICBI). The impetus for the organization came from missionary-turned-pop-intellectual Francis Schaeffer who insisted that American evangelicals had lost their commitment to both the inerrant Bible and the US Constitution that it allegedly inspired. Other politically-active evangelical leaders, and others abstained precisely because they saw the “political cast” of the ostensibly theological organization. Through its 1982 Congress on the Bible, the 1983 “Year of the Bible,” and its 1986 Statement on Biblical Application, the ICBI made its connection with the Reagan Revolution clear. Ultimately, the ICBI showed that evangelical biblicism was not separate from the emerging culture wars. Rather, a literalist theo-political hermeneutic of biblical and constitutional interpretation drove a much larger and more lasting fight over definitions of evangelicalism, religious liberty, and American law.

This paper will examine Conservative American Christians who believe that Biblical Inerrancy provides the moral defense for racism in several forms: African slavery, production of the Slave Bible, and the rejection of Critical Race Theory. These defenses are best observed in The International Council on Biblical Inerrancy (ICBI), the views and agenda of Albert Mohler Jr former President of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, Richard Furman’s letter “Exposition of the Views of the Baptists Relative to the Coloured Population...”, and Voddie Baucham’s book Fault Lines that rejects Critical Race Theory.

Defense of American slavery, creation of the Slave Bible, and the contemporary rejection of Critical Race theory all stem from the controversial reality that Biblical Inerrancy is part of the same heritage that continues to demand Black inequality within ideal Conservative American Christian culture and society.

Since its modern development in the 1970s and 80s, the doctrine of biblical inerrancy has worked to protect inherited beliefs by minimizing and often demonizing alternative interpretations of scripture, presenting them as biblically subversive and thus necessarily erroneous. Utilizing new interviews with Beth Allison Barr (The Making of Biblical Womanhood, 2021) and Sarah Stankorb (Disobedient Women, 2023), this paper will tell one part of this much larger story, particularly how inerrancy has been weaponized to promote and protect a patriarchal theology of authority, submission, and abuse. Special attention will be paid to how inerrancy has been used to attack Barr, Stankorb, and others via social media, blogs, reviews, sermons, books, and threats of lawsuit. The weaponization of inerrancy is a lived reality for these and other authors, many of whom have dared offer a hermeneutic of risk that takes seriously our historical consciousness and thereby challenges inerrancy’s desire for certainty

Opposition to reproductive freedom can be understood as a symbolic masculinity that defends a particular religious tradition as well as the discursive economy of project 2025 Given the current political climate and the rise of evangelical restrictions to other’s freedoms through legislative action, understanding this symbolic masculinity is important both communally and for the academy. Leaning on the scholarly works of Butler, Cassino, Ammerman, and Primary source documents from the International Council on Biblical Inerrancy, this paper advances the following claims. Reproductive freedom liberates women from their assumed participation in the “form” of the receptacle. Reproductive Freedom creates a sense of communal and personal crisis for evangelicals who affirm Biblical Inerrancy and Complementarianism. This sub-culture contains materializes the body through the perpetuation of “conversational plausibility structures” and a sexed economy grounded in a perpetuation of Plato’s receptacle strangely arising from an interpretation of the “inerrant” biblical text.

Respondent

Monday, 12:30 PM - 2:30 PM | Hynes Convention Center, 105 (Plaza… Session ID: A24-215
Papers Session

Since the early 20th century, biblical inerrancy served fundamentalists as a theological litmus test. In the 1970s, conservative evangelical leaders declared a “Battle for the Bible” against both liberal Protestants and moderates in their own ranks. A crucial but understudied part of this theological consolidation and its legacy in the New Christian Right was the work of the International Council on Biblical Inerrancy (ICBI). From 1978 to 1986, the ICBI gathered evangelicals to sign the Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy then Statements on Biblical Hermeneutics and Biblical Application and also helped sponsor the 1982 Congress on the Bible. The ICBI’s publications are important windows into American evangelicalism during its existence. Research into the participants in ICBI efforts and the ICBI archives offers further insights into evangelical theology, politics, and culture. These four papers are a first step toward expanding scholarly analysis of the ICBI and its impact on American evangelicalism.

Papers

This paper examines the conservative political influence of the International Council on Biblical Inerrancy (ICBI). The impetus for the organization came from missionary-turned-pop-intellectual Francis Schaeffer who insisted that American evangelicals had lost their commitment to both the inerrant Bible and the US Constitution that it allegedly inspired. Other politically-active evangelical leaders, and others abstained precisely because they saw the “political cast” of the ostensibly theological organization. Through its 1982 Congress on the Bible, the 1983 “Year of the Bible,” and its 1986 Statement on Biblical Application, the ICBI made its connection with the Reagan Revolution clear. Ultimately, the ICBI showed that evangelical biblicism was not separate from the emerging culture wars. Rather, a literalist theo-political hermeneutic of biblical and constitutional interpretation drove a much larger and more lasting fight over definitions of evangelicalism, religious liberty, and American law.

This paper will examine Conservative American Christians who believe that Biblical Inerrancy provides the moral defense for racism in several forms: African slavery, production of the Slave Bible, and the rejection of Critical Race Theory. These defenses are best observed in The International Council on Biblical Inerrancy (ICBI), the views and agenda of Albert Mohler Jr former President of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, Richard Furman’s letter “Exposition of the Views of the Baptists Relative to the Coloured Population...”, and Voddie Baucham’s book Fault Lines that rejects Critical Race Theory.

Defense of American slavery, creation of the Slave Bible, and the contemporary rejection of Critical Race theory all stem from the controversial reality that Biblical Inerrancy is part of the same heritage that continues to demand Black inequality within ideal Conservative American Christian culture and society.

Since its modern development in the 1970s and 80s, the doctrine of biblical inerrancy has worked to protect inherited beliefs by minimizing and often demonizing alternative interpretations of scripture, presenting them as biblically subversive and thus necessarily erroneous. Utilizing new interviews with Beth Allison Barr (The Making of Biblical Womanhood, 2021) and Sarah Stankorb (Disobedient Women, 2023), this paper will tell one part of this much larger story, particularly how inerrancy has been weaponized to promote and protect a patriarchal theology of authority, submission, and abuse. Special attention will be paid to how inerrancy has been used to attack Barr, Stankorb, and others via social media, blogs, reviews, sermons, books, and threats of lawsuit. The weaponization of inerrancy is a lived reality for these and other authors, many of whom have dared offer a hermeneutic of risk that takes seriously our historical consciousness and thereby challenges inerrancy’s desire for certainty

Opposition to reproductive freedom can be understood as a symbolic masculinity that defends a particular religious tradition as well as the discursive economy of project 2025 Given the current political climate and the rise of evangelical restrictions to other’s freedoms through legislative action, understanding this symbolic masculinity is important both communally and for the academy. Leaning on the scholarly works of Butler, Cassino, Ammerman, and Primary source documents from the International Council on Biblical Inerrancy, this paper advances the following claims. Reproductive freedom liberates women from their assumed participation in the “form” of the receptacle. Reproductive Freedom creates a sense of communal and personal crisis for evangelicals who affirm Biblical Inerrancy and Complementarianism. This sub-culture contains materializes the body through the perpetuation of “conversational plausibility structures” and a sexed economy grounded in a perpetuation of Plato’s receptacle strangely arising from an interpretation of the “inerrant” biblical text.

Respondent

Monday, 12:30 PM - 2:30 PM | Hynes Convention Center, 312 (Third… Session ID: A24-237
Papers Session

This panel explores marronage and fugitivity as embodied, relational, and imaginative practices of freedom, extending beyond narrow conceptions of escape and resistance. Through sonic expressions within Black preaching traditions, historical reconsiderations of maroon communities in North America, philosophical challenges to notions of self-possession, and critical ethnographic engagements with Mennonite utopian communities, the papers demonstrate how fugitivity reveals nuanced articulations of freedom. Marronage emerges as a complex interplay involving relational ties to land, ecosystems, sound, spiritual traditions, and community formation. Overall, the session explores how to redefine liberation and belonging in ways that disrupt colonial and capitalist logics of domination.

Papers

This paper will argue that a fuller understanding of Black fugitivity is achieved when regarding its sonic properties. That sound, I contend, can be located at the site of the Black sermon. I therefore intend to theorize the phenomenon of call-and-response that participates in the Black fugitive sounds heard on any given Sunday in Black churches across the United States. The sounds that inhabit the sanctuary during the sermon form what I name as the endophonic counterwitness that designates Black churches’ sanctuaries as a ‘within-space’ where the gathered congregation maroons themselves weekly. My argument attends to the ways that the sound objects—the preacher’s voice, the Hammond organ, and the gathered congregation—fuse together in the sanctuaries in Black churches forming a fugitive sound. 

This paper considers marronage as a historical and theoretical embodiment of freedom within a political economy structured by self-propriety. Placing the escape from slavery within the a Lockean account of property, I show how enslavement depends on a vision of self-mastery that mirrored the enclosure of land. Escape from slavery was not becoming a self-possessed individual but depended upon relationships between oneself and the more-than-human world, especially the connection between wild and cultivated land. To think about marronage as a practice of freedom not predicated upon self-propriety, I offer exorcism as a way of imagining liberation from property. This account not only avoids the limitations of theories of dispossession, but also allows for an understanding of freedom capacious enough to include humans and more-than-humans in the sphere of political consideration.

Political theorists, philosophers, and scholars of religion have not sufficiently examined how maroons have historically shaped and articulated visions of freedom. Notable exceptions—such as political theorist Neil Roberts’ groundbreaking theorization of freedom as marronage in the context of the Haitian Revolution—have largely overlooked marronage in North America, likely due to the long-standing assumption that maroon communities there never reached a politically significant scale. However, recent archaeological excavations in the Great Dismal Swamp of northeastern North Carolina and southeastern Virginia challenge this assumption, providing compelling evidence of large-scale, long-term maroon communities. These discoveries have prompted archaeologists and historians to reassess the dominant narratives surrounding these communities. In this presentation, I examine the promises and limitations of theorizing freedom as marronage in the context of the Great Dismal Swamp. I propose three key concepts—flight, holding ground, and illegibility—as foundational to developing a critical lexicon for this theorization.

This paper examines how the migration of Old Colony Mennonites to Maya territory in southeastern Mexico represents a form of fugitivity that simultaneously resists and reproduces colonial logics, drawing on religious myths to fuel eschatological visions of utopia. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork with both Mennonite and Maya communities, this paper focuses on Mennonite narrations of their relationship with land and scriptural texts to understand how Mennonites envision “a good place.” The paper explores the contradictions that arise as Mennonite communities attempt to enshrine particular freedoms through separatist communities while participating in agro-industrial systems that damage ecosystems and neighboring Indigenous communities. We interpret these contradictions through a reading of analogous visions of utopia in Mennonite communities and in the book of Revelation. In doing so, we aim to complicate binary understandings of resistance and complicity to power structures, suggesting that utopic visions of freedom can simultaneously offer possibilities for liberation and justifications of harm.

Monday, 12:30 PM - 2:30 PM | Sheraton, Republic A (Second Floor) Session ID: A24-200
Roundtable Session

Indigenous hermeneutics—the practice of interpreting indigenous traditions through frameworks developed by those societies themselves—has emerged as arguably the dominant framework of the field of African Religions. First developed by Professor Jacob Olupona, it has been immensely productive in freeing the study of African-derived religion from colonial biases and concerns but has curiously grown rapidly without formal publications or public engagement with the theory. Instead, scholars have adopted it through engaging directly with Prof. Olupona’s work and sharing it with each other individually. This roundtable introduces the history and theory of indigenous hermeneutics to the academic public and reflects on its place in the field of African Religions and beyond. The participants include scholars at various career stages offering different perspectives on indigenous hermeneutics with Professor Olupona himself serving as the respondent and time reserved for others who employ indigenous hermeneutics to share their thoughts and experiences as well.

Monday, 12:30 PM - 2:30 PM | Marriott Copley Place, Dartmouth (Third… Session ID: A24-221
Papers Session

In popular discourse people often use the term ethics to describe the ways humans properly interact with each other, or the virtuous moral formation of the individual. One can see this in much of the discourse of Jewish ethics which often focuses on questions within bioethics, sexual ethics, and politics, among others. Even when Jewish ethics is expanded beyond these questions it is often used to address our relations to living things like animals and the earth. This panel expands the realm of Jewish ethics by asking about our obligations to categories beyond the living, namely the not-yet-conceived, the dead, and artificial intelligence. We ask together how might Jewish ethics help us better relate to beings that are not alive? Ultimately this panel argues that we must expand our moral language, concepts, and values in order to develop a Jewish ethics for the not-quite-human.

Papers

Ethics is sometimes thought to be narrowly a concern with our treatment of the Other, a living thing: the neighbor, the loved one, animals, the earth, or God. However Jewish ethics also has a robust understanding of our obligations to the no longer living, to the no-longer-human. Of course Jewish rituals around death and mourning are well known and well studied. What has received less attention is our moral obligations to the dead body itself. By studying the Jewish visual response to death, namely how Jews traditionally (do not) depict and gaze upon the dead, I argue that ultimately it is the ethical agent’s moral responsibility to render the dead invisible. The Jewish corpse, a no-longer-human being who is not quite an object, who can experience shame and contains the image of God, requires that it ultimately be erased from this world, no longer available to living eyes. 

While recent feminist Jewish thought has used critiques of abstraction as a feminist tool to criticize the way that canonical figures in Jewish thought have theorized the “ethical relation," this paper will suggest that abstraction plays a key role in a range of experiences, including experiences of infertility. To do this, the paper will show that, like many other kinds of experiences related to childbearing and childrearing, experiences of infertility are deeply shaped by obligation, but these obligations are directed towards an Other who remains abstract—the hoped-for child. In this way, the paper challenges us to develop new tools for describing the important conceptual contributions that theorizations of parental experience can make to contemporary ethical discourse. 

This paper explores the emerging phenomenon of AI-based simulations of the dead and the ethical issues they raise, particularly in a Jewish context. The capacity of AI to mimic styles from limited data offers potential therapeutic and memorialization benefits, yet also presents serious concerns. Central among these are questions of consent, privacy, the integrity of data-driven identities, and disruptions to the grieving process. Within Jewish tradition, the decentralized nature of authority and the reliance on historical precedent complicate the establishment of new norms. The author proposes two guiding principles—a right to be remembered and a right to be forgotten—and shows that these principles can be grounded in Jewish sources. Drawing on examples from twentieth-century and medieval Jewish history, the paper outlines how entirely new moral norms can be developed in response to unprecedented ethical dilemmas.

Monday, 12:30 PM - 2:30 PM | Marriott Copley Place, Tufts (Third… Session ID: A24-217
Papers Session

Although studies of Protestant Christianity have often “located” Protestantism in individuals and their interior beliefs, this panel instead frames Protestantism as a tradition that desires to plant itself in the physical world. We suggest Protestantism sustains itself through socio-material worlds, and we propose researchers will be better able to visualize Protestantism – and its effects on the late modern Western world – by mapping such Protestant worlds. The overarching question for our panel, then, is: How might we map Protestantism? We focus on North American Protestantisms (and their global reach) in the pivotal period from the mid-nineteenth to the early twentieth century, when much of the scaffolding was built for today’s disciplines of geography, history, natural science, and religious studies. The five papers discuss different map-making methods that can help researchers “see” these Protestant worlds and their effects: geographic maps; temporal charts; taxonomic catalogs; mental diagrams; and frames for scholarly visualizations.

Papers

Missionary geographic enthusiasm was a vital component of nineteenth-century missionaries’ attempts to inform the American Protestant public about the world, its people, and their supposed need for evangelism. Starting in the late 1820s, missionary leaders of Monthly Prayer Concerts turned to maps and other geographic information as a key part of the “missionary intelligence” they shared with American audiences. Maps served several purposes in missionary intelligence: to educate and entertain, to make the far away and distant feel near, and to help American Protestants take a livelier interest in the world around them. Ministers sought to harness the power of visual aids and compelling narrative to turn public educational lectures into tools for the advance of foreign missions in the world at large. But these efforts to educate Americans about the world brought missionary conceptions of the hierarchies of world religions, cultures, and race into American geographic understandings.

Recent scholarship on maps suggests we must reimagine what we think a map looks like and what a map does. Maps are lively images that can take many visual forms, perform many functions in society, and assert many different claims about the relationships between human beings and their environments. Maps can also make claims about time, articulating relationships between the past, present, and future. This paper invites scholars to rethink the significance of maps in Protestantism by examining two Bible maps from the early twentieth century: a map of “The Holy Land” in the Scofield Reference Bible of 1909 and a chart made by dispensationalist minister Clarence Larkin in 1920. Examining the materiality of these images and their functions in Protestant communities, this paper argues Bible maps and charts made distinct claims about contemporary politics, the Bible’s relationship to geography in the past and present, and the sacrality of time.

William Dawson was a staunch Presbyterian. He was also a celebrated nineteenth-century geologist, president of Montreal’s Natural History Society, and principal of McGill University. In his view, cataloging scientific specimens bolstered his faith. This paper begins by considering Dawson’s taxonomic work as a form of Protestant mapping. It then jumps to the present when it inspired my experiment organizing a new “Natural History Society” at McGill, which included scholars and artists. We presented artifacts to each other, created our own weird taxonomic maps, and made a digital pedagogy tool. The project was a “serious parody” (Wilcox 2018), a ludic protest that parodies a dominant cultural form, while gaining real insights in the process. Making our own taxonomies was also an experiential form of critique, a way to move “map” closer to “territory” in J.Z. Smith’s terms. Can it help us to reimagine complex relationships with each other and the planet?

This paper thinks diagrammatically about how to visualize Protestant subjects and subjectivities. Thinking about subjects through diagrams allows us to ask: How are subjects made in and through their spatial existence? Rather than starting from the classic trope of Protestant interior individualism, I argue diagramming is a method that can help us shift toward a deeper understanding of Protestant subjects-in-the-world. I especially build on recent scholarship on diagrams as methods of mapping in cultural anthropology, and I extend this into religious studies. When we think about subjects through the lens of space, it becomes clear the Protestant tradition incorporates a multitude of types of cartographic subjectivities. The paper discusses three example diagrams of Protestant subjectivity: the subject as concentric circles; the subject as a relational ensemble; and the subject as a friction-filled coupling.

This paper historicizes how scholars came to frame Protestantism as a disenchanted, modern religion focused on thinking about immaterial beliefs. It demonstrates that this view, although pervasive, is not inherent to Protestantism itself. This view is a modern definition of religion that took hold among freethinkers who practiced the “religion of secularism” from the 1890s onward. In cartoons, freethinkers criticized Protestantism as a material form of religion that focused too much on supernatural objects and beings. Freethinkers offered new interpretations of Enlightenment epistemologies that suggested secularism was a truly enlightened, modern religion because it focused on immaterial beliefs. Ironically, the religion of secularism informed the secular historical method, through which scholars studied Protestantism as a tradition of immaterial beliefs. This paper offers a way of remapping belief in Protestantism according to eighteenth-century Enlightenment epistemologies, which Protestants adapted to practice their enlightened, material form of religion well into the twentieth century. 

Respondent

Monday, 12:30 PM - 2:30 PM | Sheraton, Fairfax A (Third Floor) Session ID: A24-210
Papers Session

This panel explores emotions in Korean philosophy and culture, offering diverse perspectives on moral and immoral emotions. The first presentation examines the emotional life of Confucian sages using Yi Ik's comprehensive typology of emotions. The second paper reframes negative emotions within the Confucian tradition through Jeong Yagyong's work, emphasizing individualized moral self-cultivation.

The third presentation analyzes emotional expressions in Joseon literati women's writings, highlighting how their articulations of resentment and vulnerability facilitated interpersonal connections. The final paper investigates the philosophical implications of Jeong, a contemporary Korean emotional concept, comparing it with ancient Greek and Chinese notions of joy.

Collectively, these papers provide a multifaceted examination of emotions in Korean philosophical thought, spanning historical Confucian perspectives to present-day cultural concepts. This research contributes to understanding the complex interplay between Confucian ethics, gender dynamics, and emotional expression in Korean society.

Papers

This paper examines the emotional life of Confucian sages, drawing upon the Korean Confucian scholar Seongho Yi Ik’s 李瀷 (1681-1763) account of human emotions and the emotions of sages. While much scholarship has explored the cultivation process that leads to the exemplary life of sages, less attention has been given to their inner emotional experiences. To address this gap, I first outline the effortful life of ordinary people, who must remain vigilant in monitoring and regulating their emotions, distinguishing moral emotions from personal emotions and ensuring that the latter are properly guided by the former. I then turn to the effortless life of sages, whose actions are always appropriate and spontaneous. I make two key claims: 1) sages do not experience the Four Beginnings, and 2) sages experience only the Seven Emotions. This analysis reveals an overlooked dimension of Confucian ethics that extends beyond interpersonal relationships. 

Since Mengzi, who argued that the four basic emotions demonstrate the inherent goodness of human nature, Confucianism has emphasized the moral significance of emotions in ethical behavior. However, negative emotions such as jealousy, arrogance, and dissatisfaction disrupt internal harmony and strain relationships, raising questions about their role in moral cultivation.
In Confucian thought, emotions have traditionally been linked to qi (氣) or physical temperament, complicating the concept of emotional autonomy. However, Jeong Yagyong (Dasan), an influential 18th-century Korean philosopher, challenged this view. He rejected the idea that temperament significantly influences morality, diverging from Neo-Confucian interpretations.
This presentation will explore Dasan's perspective on negative emotions, examining how he reframed their ethical significance and offered a more individualized approach to moral self-development. The analysis contributes to broader discussions on the moral role of emotions in Confucian ethics, offering new insights into the intersection of emotion, temperament, and morality in East Asian philosophy.

This paper explores the role of resentment in Joseon women's literary expressions, challenging traditional Confucian views. While resentment is often seen as a sign of weakness, it becomes transformative when combined with moral emotions like filial longing and self-respect.

The study analyzes how these women's writings—poems, letters, and notes—served as a medium for self-empowerment and solidarity. Despite their wishes to have these works destroyed after death, they were preserved and shared across generations.

By revealing vulnerability through writing, Joseon women empowered themselves and created a shared emotional landscape with others facing similar circumstances. This research highlights the interplay between Confucian ethics, gender dynamics, and emotional expression in Joseon society.

This article explores the philosophical implications of “Jeong,” a concept cluster that represents the emotions of Koreans today. “Jeong” originated from the Chinese character 情, but after going through a long and persistent debate on emotions in Joseon Confucianism and riding through the conceptual history of the modern period when Eastern and Western cultures clashed and merged, thereby establishing itself as a core notion representing the basis of Korean minds. 
Since its meaning has evolved between the waves of Eastern and Western cultures, to gauge the context and semantic nuances of “Jeong”, I first examine the philosophical discussed in ancient Greek and Chinese traditions from a comparative philosophical perspective. Then, I will argue that “Jeong” is a philosophical joy that reflects and encompasses other emotional keywords that express emotions in Korean culture and arts, such as the two aesthetic emotions in a dynamic relationship, joy (heung) and sorrow (han).
 

Business Meeting
Monday, 12:30 PM - 2:30 PM | Sheraton, Fairfax A (Third Floor) Session ID: A24-210
Papers Session

This panel explores emotions in Korean philosophy and culture, offering diverse perspectives on moral and immoral emotions. The first presentation examines the emotional life of Confucian sages using Yi Ik's comprehensive typology of emotions. The second paper reframes negative emotions within the Confucian tradition through Jeong Yagyong's work, emphasizing individualized moral self-cultivation.

The third presentation analyzes emotional expressions in Joseon literati women's writings, highlighting how their articulations of resentment and vulnerability facilitated interpersonal connections. The final paper investigates the philosophical implications of Jeong, a contemporary Korean emotional concept, comparing it with ancient Greek and Chinese notions of joy.

Collectively, these papers provide a multifaceted examination of emotions in Korean philosophical thought, spanning historical Confucian perspectives to present-day cultural concepts. This research contributes to understanding the complex interplay between Confucian ethics, gender dynamics, and emotional expression in Korean society.

Papers

This paper examines the emotional life of Confucian sages, drawing upon the Korean Confucian scholar Seongho Yi Ik’s 李瀷 (1681-1763) account of human emotions and the emotions of sages. While much scholarship has explored the cultivation process that leads to the exemplary life of sages, less attention has been given to their inner emotional experiences. To address this gap, I first outline the effortful life of ordinary people, who must remain vigilant in monitoring and regulating their emotions, distinguishing moral emotions from personal emotions and ensuring that the latter are properly guided by the former. I then turn to the effortless life of sages, whose actions are always appropriate and spontaneous. I make two key claims: 1) sages do not experience the Four Beginnings, and 2) sages experience only the Seven Emotions. This analysis reveals an overlooked dimension of Confucian ethics that extends beyond interpersonal relationships. 

Since Mengzi, who argued that the four basic emotions demonstrate the inherent goodness of human nature, Confucianism has emphasized the moral significance of emotions in ethical behavior. However, negative emotions such as jealousy, arrogance, and dissatisfaction disrupt internal harmony and strain relationships, raising questions about their role in moral cultivation.
In Confucian thought, emotions have traditionally been linked to qi (氣) or physical temperament, complicating the concept of emotional autonomy. However, Jeong Yagyong (Dasan), an influential 18th-century Korean philosopher, challenged this view. He rejected the idea that temperament significantly influences morality, diverging from Neo-Confucian interpretations.
This presentation will explore Dasan's perspective on negative emotions, examining how he reframed their ethical significance and offered a more individualized approach to moral self-development. The analysis contributes to broader discussions on the moral role of emotions in Confucian ethics, offering new insights into the intersection of emotion, temperament, and morality in East Asian philosophy.

This paper explores the role of resentment in Joseon women's literary expressions, challenging traditional Confucian views. While resentment is often seen as a sign of weakness, it becomes transformative when combined with moral emotions like filial longing and self-respect.

The study analyzes how these women's writings—poems, letters, and notes—served as a medium for self-empowerment and solidarity. Despite their wishes to have these works destroyed after death, they were preserved and shared across generations.

By revealing vulnerability through writing, Joseon women empowered themselves and created a shared emotional landscape with others facing similar circumstances. This research highlights the interplay between Confucian ethics, gender dynamics, and emotional expression in Joseon society.

This article explores the philosophical implications of “Jeong,” a concept cluster that represents the emotions of Koreans today. “Jeong” originated from the Chinese character 情, but after going through a long and persistent debate on emotions in Joseon Confucianism and riding through the conceptual history of the modern period when Eastern and Western cultures clashed and merged, thereby establishing itself as a core notion representing the basis of Korean minds. 
Since its meaning has evolved between the waves of Eastern and Western cultures, to gauge the context and semantic nuances of “Jeong”, I first examine the philosophical discussed in ancient Greek and Chinese traditions from a comparative philosophical perspective. Then, I will argue that “Jeong” is a philosophical joy that reflects and encompasses other emotional keywords that express emotions in Korean culture and arts, such as the two aesthetic emotions in a dynamic relationship, joy (heung) and sorrow (han).
 

Business Meeting
Monday, 12:30 PM - 2:30 PM | Sheraton, Liberty A (Second Floor) Session ID: A24-208
Papers Session

Inter-spirituality and multiple religious belonging are categories that scholars utilize to describe individuals and communities that lie beyond the borders and boundaries of traditional religious affiliation or identification. This panel investigates recent trends and contemporary inter-spiritual mystics or movements, as well as past examples of persons, communities, or theorists who embody or exemplify multiple or religious cross-identification based upon their own mystical experience or praxis. 

Papers

Thomas Merton was a pioneer in interreligious dialogue and interspirituality, engaging in years of correspondence with practitioners from Buddhist, Muslim, Hindu, Jewish, Indigenous and other religious traditions. His extended dialogue with Zen writer D.T. Suzuki was published in Merton's Zen and the Birds of Appetite, and many of Merton's final days in Asia were spent with Tibetan monks and other Buddhist practitioners. Yet, Richard King and others have argued that despite Suzuki's warm reception in the West, he occupied a minority viewpoint within Zen which was tailor-made for such export. But this paper argues that Merton is no Orientalist appropriator. He was uniquely qualified to engage in interreligious dialogue, not because he was a scholarly expert, but because he was a mystic. Merton cultivated dialogue for the purposes of deepening his own monastic practice and fostering justice in the world. His pathbreaking interreligious exploration shows how interreligious dialogue can move in decolonizing directions.

“However strange it may appear, I was led to Yoga by William of Saint-Thierry.” This sentence began the preface of Jean-Marie Déchanet’s English translation of his mid-twentieth century book titled La Voie Du Silence later translated as Christian Yoga. In the text, Déchanet argues the aim of both William of Saint-Thierry, a French Benedictine mystic,  and Christian Yoga is the union and balance of anima, animus, and spiritus. For him, Yoga creates an “openness [toward the] mystical life,” “quickens the life of faith, the love of God and our neighbor,” and “sharpens our sense of duty and responsibility as men and, above all, as Christians.” While he argues yoga supports the Christian spiritual life, Déchanet enforces parameters on what type of yoga a Christian should practice. This paper examines Déchanet’s argument for a Christian Yoga through his historical context and scholarship of William of Saint-Thierry. 

By primarily incubating his imagination and that of his audience, both as a writer and preacher, Howard Thurman draws from various resources: spiritual traditions, nature, poetry, and friendships, and invites himself and others to transcend the boundaries of a life contained by a dominant, totalizing narrative. This essay dives into a common theme that unites Thurman’s writings: the stretching of one’s vision and desire for interconnectedness amidst the vicissitudes of life, collective trauma, racial and class discrimination, and other forms of systemic oppression. Multiple religious belonging adds more taste buds to Thurman’s religious sense, metaphorically speaking. Thurman drank from several spiritual wells. Following my examination of Thurman’s spirituality, which finds roots in inter-spiritual experiences, I will reflect on Thurman’s spiritual fluidity and his philosophy of interdependence.

In 1960, the Catholic monk, Thomas Merton (1915-1968), received a copy of the Talks on the Gita. This commentary on the Bhagavad Gita was written by Vinoba Bhave, disciple, confidant, and spiritual successor to Mahatma Gandhi. The book has a marked impact on Merton, providing him with a framework and language to process his vocational crisis in 1960, to bear non-violent witness in 1962, and to critique contemporary spirituality in 1965. In this paper, we explore a transition in Merton’s understanding of the Gita. We argue that, with the Talks on the Gita, Merton comes to understand the Gita as a text of both personal and universal application, and to see Vinoba as an inter-religious sage. Merton envisions Vinoba and his teachings as universally applicable: transcending ideological boundaries and broadening his more global worldview. Merton’s efforts proffer relevant questions about the identification, meaning, and lived experience of “multiple religious belonging.”