In-person November Annual Meeting 2026 Program Book

Monday June 22nd - Thursday June 25th

All time are listed in Eastern Time Zone.

Please note that this schedule is subject to change and is currently being updated. Please excuse our appearance as we finalize the schedule. If you have any questions, please contact annualmeeting@aarweb.org.

Thank you to our 2026 Online June Annual Meeting Sponsors

Diamond: The Wabash Center for Teaching and Learning in Theology and Religion - The Wabash Center | Wabash Center

Platinum: The Louisville Institute - Louisville Institute

Gold: Religion and American Culture: A journal of Interpretation - Religion & American Culture: A Journal of Interpretation - Religion and American Culture

Silver: Association for Public Religion and Intellectual Life (APRIL) - Home - April Online

Baker Academic - https://bakeracademic.com/

Baylor University Press - https://www.baylorpress.com/

The Institute for Religion, Politics and Culture - https://www.iliff.edu/iliff-irpc/

The International Society for the Study of Religion, Nature, and Culture - https://www.issrnc.org/

 

Saturday, 3:00 PM - 4:30 PM Session ID: A21-309
Papers Session

What will it mean to belong in the future church—and who gets to decide?

This session explores how emerging forms of ecclesial life are reshaping the meanings and practices of belonging. Drawing on empirical and ethnographic research, these papers examine how belonging is being reshaped across migration, digital mediation, and ecumenical practice, inviting us to rethink belonging as fluid, contested, and newly configured for the future church. This conversation will open new possibilities and raise urgent questions about identity, authority, and community.

Papers

What becomes of ecclesial belonging when the immigrant congregation that formed you can no longer hold you? Drawing on a hermeneutic phenomenological study of eight Indonesian American emerging adults raised in two Southern California evangelical congregations, this paper argues that departure from the immigrant church is not the failure of an ecclesial imaginary but its reconfiguration. The study surfaces several collective themes spanning the affirmative (resourcing, closeness, formation) and the critical (otherness, differences, schisms), revealing how participants carry the formational imprint of their ethnic faith communities into new contexts—from pan-Asian fellowships to “exvangelical” disaffiliation. Deploying a kinopolitical notion of imagined communities for non-linear faith identity development (Anderson [1983] 2016; Gin 2009; Nail 2015), the paper positions these departures as ecclesial flows rather than mere congregational losses—to reimagine belonging as circulation rather than enclosure—and hears in them echoes of Deus Migrator (Phan 2016), the God who travels with the (ecclesial) migrant.

“Ecumenical shared ministries” (ESMs) result from two or more congregations merging resources and worshipping together while retaining distinct denominational affiliations (Beardsall et al. 2018). In 2025, I conducted a qualitative study of two ESMs in neighbouring rural communities. Adapting Sarah Dunlop’s method of “narrated photography,” I collected photos of each ESM’s worship space (Dunlop 2024). I then conducted semi-structured interviews to explore how congregants engage in receptive ecumenism to discover “what each tradition might…fruitfully have to learn from the other” (Murray 2008).

My qualitative data suggests that the messy work of receptive ecumenism happens for ESMs through real-time encounters between differently ritualized bodies in a shared worship space. One ESM models receptive ecumenism by bringing differently ritualized bodies into the same space for a shared liturgy. The other ESM rarely engages in receptive ecumenism because differently ritualized bodies take turns using the same space instead of worshipping together in it.

This paper explores the emergence of AI-generated Christian influencer characters circulating on platforms such as TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube. In a viral TikTok video with over 30 million views, an AI-generated Moses recounts the Exodus narrative in the style of a POV influencer vlog. Accounts such as holyvlogsz, followed by 450,000 users, portray biblical figures—Daniel narrating the lion’s den or Mary announcing her pregnancy—as social media personalities addressing contemporary audiences. Through content analysis of these viral videos, the paper interprets the phenomenon through the lens of mediatization theory, which examines how media logics increasingly structure religious communication. The paper also analyzes the racialized aesthetics of AI-generated biblical figures, showing how visual conventions derived from Western Christian imagery and global platform culture shape representations of sacred characters and influence emerging forms of digitally mediated religious authority. The paper investigates the merging of histories and futures in the AI Christian influencer. 

Saturday, 3:00 PM - 4:30 PM Session ID: A21-308
Papers Session

While Daoism is fundamentally a liturgical tradition, scholarship has frequently focused on the history and structure of its rites rather than the precarious mechanisms of their efficacy. This panel interrogates the productive category of “ritual failure” in Chinese religion, Daoist rites in particular, moving beyond functionalist binaries of success versus failure. Taking Catherine Bell’s analysis of Lu Xiujing, specifically her insights on the bureaucratic metaphor and the priesthood’s consolidation of efficacy, as a theoretical departure point, we examine how failure is constructed and managed across three distinct contexts: Song dynasty anecdotal literature, late imperial stele inscriptions, and contemporary Daoist practice in Hunan. The papers argue that ritual breakdown is rarely a void; instead, it serves as a critical diagnostic site where moral boundaries are hardened, institutional authority is reorganized through legal coordination, and divine-human relations are intimately recalibrated through bodily technologies. Collectively, we demonstrate that efficacy in Daoist rituals resides not merely in the completion of a rite, but in the sophisticated management of its potential collapse.

Papers

This paper investigates the dynamics of ritual failure in Hong Mai's twelfth-century collection Yijian zhi, situating its anecdotal narratives within the socioreligious context of the Song dynasty. Drawing on Ronald Grimes's taxonomy of ritual "infelicities" and Edward Schieffelin's distinction between procedure- and outcome-oriented failure, the study identifies two categories of failed rites. The first encompasses performance-centered breakdowns—flawed petitions, impure personnel, and procedural errors—that Grimes's framework diagnoses effectively. The second, however, resists such explanations: rituals that are correctly performed yet catastrophically rejected. To account for these cases, the paper introduces the concept of "cosmological invalidation," whereby a ritual's efficacy is nullified not by human error but by a higher moral-bureaucratic order governing karmic debts and underworld adjudication. The paper argues that narratives of inevitable retribution served a theodical function in a period of political instability, challenging the universality of performance-centered and strategic-negotiation models of ritual theory.

 

 

 

 

 

This paper examines ritual failure through the practice of jiaobei (珓杯, moon-block divination) in Daoist and local ritual contexts in central Hunan. Jiaobei are routinely cast there at critical moments of ritual performance to confirm divine permission for a ritual to proceed. When divinatory results fail to meet ritual expectations, it produces a publicly visible moment of uncertainty.

Rather than signalling ritual breakdown, such moments initiate a process of negotiation. Drawing on ongoing fieldwork, this paper analyses how ritual masters respond to unfavourable jiaobei results by modifying bodily techniques, e.g. mudras and mantras, and ritual pacing in order to “urge” the divination (cui gua 催卦). These practices reflect a structured compromise between gods and ritual specialists grounded in Daoist ritual logics.

I argue that jiaobei-mediated ritual failure is an anticipated and productive condition that reaffirms relational authority between gods, ritual masters, and the ritual community, rather than undermining ritual efficacy.

Drawing on late imperial steles from southern Shanxi, this study examines a form of ritual failure that emerged when the infrastructural and organizational conditions sustaining ritual life broke down. The inscriptions record recurring disruptions, including failures to enforce festival calendars and service obligations, disputes over offerings and exactions, and the appropriation of temple property, which generated missed or failed rites. This article argues that ritual efficacy depended less on divine responsiveness than on the functioning of coordination mechanisms that allowed ritual to operate across communities. Local ritual was experienced as effective not through greater splendor, but through stable, low-friction routines grounded in predictable rules, manageable costs, clear resource boundaries, and workable inter-community coordination. When these conditions collapsed, officials and local elites intervened, claiming to bring ritual back under governance through regulation and documentation, thereby reorganizing local authority in the name of repairing efficacy. Ritual failure thus provides a window onto local power dynamics.

Respondent

Saturday, 3:00 PM - 4:30 PM Session ID: A21-308
Papers Session

While Daoism is fundamentally a liturgical tradition, scholarship has frequently focused on the history and structure of its rites rather than the precarious mechanisms of their efficacy. This panel interrogates the productive category of “ritual failure” in Chinese religion, Daoist rites in particular, moving beyond functionalist binaries of success versus failure. Taking Catherine Bell’s analysis of Lu Xiujing, specifically her insights on the bureaucratic metaphor and the priesthood’s consolidation of efficacy, as a theoretical departure point, we examine how failure is constructed and managed across three distinct contexts: Song dynasty anecdotal literature, late imperial stele inscriptions, and contemporary Daoist practice in Hunan. The papers argue that ritual breakdown is rarely a void; instead, it serves as a critical diagnostic site where moral boundaries are hardened, institutional authority is reorganized through legal coordination, and divine-human relations are intimately recalibrated through bodily technologies. Collectively, we demonstrate that efficacy in Daoist rituals resides not merely in the completion of a rite, but in the sophisticated management of its potential collapse.

Papers

This paper investigates the dynamics of ritual failure in Hong Mai's twelfth-century collection Yijian zhi, situating its anecdotal narratives within the socioreligious context of the Song dynasty. Drawing on Ronald Grimes's taxonomy of ritual "infelicities" and Edward Schieffelin's distinction between procedure- and outcome-oriented failure, the study identifies two categories of failed rites. The first encompasses performance-centered breakdowns—flawed petitions, impure personnel, and procedural errors—that Grimes's framework diagnoses effectively. The second, however, resists such explanations: rituals that are correctly performed yet catastrophically rejected. To account for these cases, the paper introduces the concept of "cosmological invalidation," whereby a ritual's efficacy is nullified not by human error but by a higher moral-bureaucratic order governing karmic debts and underworld adjudication. The paper argues that narratives of inevitable retribution served a theodical function in a period of political instability, challenging the universality of performance-centered and strategic-negotiation models of ritual theory.

 

 

 

 

 

This paper examines ritual failure through the practice of jiaobei (珓杯, moon-block divination) in Daoist and local ritual contexts in central Hunan. Jiaobei are routinely cast there at critical moments of ritual performance to confirm divine permission for a ritual to proceed. When divinatory results fail to meet ritual expectations, it produces a publicly visible moment of uncertainty.

Rather than signalling ritual breakdown, such moments initiate a process of negotiation. Drawing on ongoing fieldwork, this paper analyses how ritual masters respond to unfavourable jiaobei results by modifying bodily techniques, e.g. mudras and mantras, and ritual pacing in order to “urge” the divination (cui gua 催卦). These practices reflect a structured compromise between gods and ritual specialists grounded in Daoist ritual logics.

I argue that jiaobei-mediated ritual failure is an anticipated and productive condition that reaffirms relational authority between gods, ritual masters, and the ritual community, rather than undermining ritual efficacy.

Drawing on late imperial steles from southern Shanxi, this study examines a form of ritual failure that emerged when the infrastructural and organizational conditions sustaining ritual life broke down. The inscriptions record recurring disruptions, including failures to enforce festival calendars and service obligations, disputes over offerings and exactions, and the appropriation of temple property, which generated missed or failed rites. This article argues that ritual efficacy depended less on divine responsiveness than on the functioning of coordination mechanisms that allowed ritual to operate across communities. Local ritual was experienced as effective not through greater splendor, but through stable, low-friction routines grounded in predictable rules, manageable costs, clear resource boundaries, and workable inter-community coordination. When these conditions collapsed, officials and local elites intervened, claiming to bring ritual back under governance through regulation and documentation, thereby reorganizing local authority in the name of repairing efficacy. Ritual failure thus provides a window onto local power dynamics.

Respondent

Saturday, 3:00 PM - 4:30 PM Session ID: A21-333
Papers Session

AI has entered the African Diaspora Religions (ADR) space. Known for embodied cosmologies and epistemologies where knowledge, communication, and communion are deeply mapped into and evoke from the body - where feet, hands, head, back, and chest, and the rhythm and placement of hips, shoulders, and buttocks speak to, about, and from divinities, and where touch and sound center and elevate encounters - ADR practitioners have begun augmenting and/or transforming their practices through the use of AI as a spiritual medium. Simultaneously, practitioners are themselves transforming AI. At once captivated and captured by futures of religious and spiritual life, on the frontier of new worlds, ADR practitioners are harnessing AI in powerful ways to stay intimately connected across the globe - traversing uncharted territories of spiritual/religious realms near and far. In this session presenters explore, examine, and/or interrogate AI and ADR practitioners' fluid concepts of power, agency, embodiment, stasis, and futurity.

Papers

Ruha Benjamin contends that “we are living in the imagination of AI evangelists” who promise “ to guide us into the Future™” while “positioning themselves as Guardians of the Galaxy, even as they engineer the crises against which we must guard” (2024).  As these “AI evangelists” advance an eschatological and redemptive vision for their technology—while obscuring its dystopian propensities— Jamaican Revival Zion practitioners are troubling the exclusionary logics of “algorithms,” “artificial intelligence,” and even the very constitution of “science” and “technology.” Revivalists, and practitioners of other Africana religions, have long grappled with dystopian worlds not made for them, even as they are used as fungible resources from which to create these imperialist futures.  The paper offers Revivalists’ use of TikTok as a digital balmyard, mediated by copresences and seemingly divinatory algorithms, as a case study in the contentious world-building potentialities and “technologies of spiritual refusal” housed within Africana religions (Stewart 2022). 

This paper highlights the prominent role of digital technology among next-generation African diaspora Christians. From the moment one enters All Nations Church in New Jersey (ANCNJ) , the pervasive presence of digital media is unmistakable. Large, cinema-like screens evoke the immersive atmosphere of Times Square, while high-quality live-streaming reflects sophisticated, often unseen technological infrastructures. ANCNJ actively engages across multiple social media platforms, aligning its ministry with the digital habits of emerging generations. Spoken word is used as an embodied form of religious expression, and the digital space is engaged with as a cyber sanctuary.  Participants narrate their spiritual journeys, voice communal concerns, and translate doctrinal themes into embodied and culturally resonant expressions. Spoken word becomes a liturgical act and a process of identity formation, serving as a new practice of gospel proclamation. Drawing on participant observation and semi-structured interviews, this paper examines how second-generation migrants appropriate popular culture to express faith and identity. 

This paper examines religion as an affective, digital, and political practice through which young Ghanaians attempt to navigate economic precarity and global inequality. Focusing on Christian youth in Accra, ages 18-35, the study interrogates how spirituality mediates psychic life and how religious practices and spaces function as modes of survival and social networks, as places of belonging, identity, and ethical formation. As Africa’s youth population rapidly expands, this research examines youth as a social category formed through technological ambiguities, structural failures, and uncertain futures, global ecological pressures, and declining mental health. To make sense of Africa’s religious landscape, the research introduces the language of “warped intimacies” and argues that Ghanaian youth’s high religiosity reveals a reconfiguration of social relations toward religious figures and institutions. This project aims to unearth the material and affective consequences of transnational economic and theological forces on the lives of young Ghanaians.

Saturday, 3:00 PM - 4:30 PM Session ID: A21-329
Roundtable Session

This roundtable session examines the unfinished manuscript written by Mary Daly, Catholicism: End or Beginning. Now published as a volume, the roundtable brings together its contributors to extend the conversation started by this text. The central conviction of this panel is that Daly is indeed a part of the Catholic Intellectual Tradition – whether Daly and Roman Catholic scholars would claim one another or not. As such, this panel hopes to bring Daly back into conversation with Catholic theologians. In so doing, the panel will explore two major elements of Daly’s life and intellectual journey: (1) her time as an observer at the Second Vatican Council (2) the significance of her engagement with Catholic theologians in Catholicism: End or Beginning (CEB) as well as the points of intersection between Daly Studies and Catholic Studies. The panel will conclude with a reflection on the ecclesiological challenges her thought offers the church today.

Saturday, 3:00 PM - 4:30 PM Session ID: A21-329
Roundtable Session

This roundtable session examines the unfinished manuscript written by Mary Daly, Catholicism: End or Beginning. Now published as a volume, the roundtable brings together its contributors to extend the conversation started by this text. The central conviction of this panel is that Daly is indeed a part of the Catholic Intellectual Tradition – whether Daly and Roman Catholic scholars would claim one another or not. As such, this panel hopes to bring Daly back into conversation with Catholic theologians. In so doing, the panel will explore two major elements of Daly’s life and intellectual journey: (1) her time as an observer at the Second Vatican Council (2) the significance of her engagement with Catholic theologians in Catholicism: End or Beginning (CEB) as well as the points of intersection between Daly Studies and Catholic Studies. The panel will conclude with a reflection on the ecclesiological challenges her thought offers the church today.

Saturday, 3:00 PM - 4:30 PM Session ID: A21-319
Roundtable Session

This session honors the extraordinary contributions of Carrie Doehring, a leading scholar in the psychology of religion, pastoral psychology, pastoral theology, and chaplaincy; a licensed psychologist; a theological educator; and a Presbyterian minister. Doehring’s work has profoundly shaped the field through her commitment to teaching and researching interreligious, socially just, and research-informed spiritual care. Her scholarship has been especially influential in advancing trauma-informed spiritual care, addressing moral injury and moral stress, and exploring spiritual struggle, all while integrating clinical practice with theological reflection. This session celebrates her enduring impact by engaging her intellectual legacy and exploring how her contributions continue to inform contemporary approaches to spiritual care, pastoral theology, and the psychology of religion. In this session, Doehring will present a paper on lamentation and spiritual reflexivity, followed by responses from a panel of scholars who will engage both the paper and her broader contributions to the field.

Saturday, 3:00 PM - 4:30 PM Session ID: A21-304
Roundtable Session

This roundtable asks how karma-informed phenomenologies of world-making might reframe existing conversations about structural violence, collective responsibility, and the shared creation of just and plural worlds. The six panelists engage Buddhist karmic frameworks as resources for understanding how collectives – communities, institutions, movements, pilgrims, memorializers, consumers – participate in the ongoing making/unmaking and maintenance of shared worlds. Scholars working at the intersection of Buddhist philosophical and practice traditions, critical social analysis, social organizing, phenomenology, and ethnography broadly engage questions to consider how inherited karmic formations unfold prereflectively to naturalize structures of harm and constrain our collective imagination; and what forms of practice, memorialization, or political and community organization demonstrate the possibility of karmic transformation at a more expansive scale.

Saturday, 3:00 PM - 4:30 PM Session ID: A21-313
Papers Session

Sponsored by Innovations in Chaplaincy and Spiritual Care, this session brings together three presenters exploring how chaplains are reimagining spiritual care to meet emerging forms of collective suffering and transformation. One paper examines transdisciplinary approaches to chaplaincy that foster resilience amid ecological and social crises, expanding spiritual care into community and organizational settings. A second presentation investigates the expanding field of animal and interspecies chaplaincy, highlighting how practitioners sustain ethical presence in contexts of human–animal grief and transition. The third paper offers a compelling vision of labor solidarity as a spiritual and vocational commitment for healthcare chaplains, grounded in feminist and Catholic social ethics. Together, these papers illuminate new frontiers of chaplaincy practice—shaping compassionate responses to ecological, interspecies, and labor realities of our time.

Papers

We are living in a time of global meta-crisis marked by ecological disruption, social instability, and widespread emotional, physiological, and spiritual distress. As uncertainty deepens, the role of chaplains becomes increasingly vital. This paper explores how chaplains can expand traditional forms of spiritual accompaniment by integrating resilience, innovation, and relational skills to support organizations addressing social suffering. Drawing on my lived experience as a case study, I examine how chaplaincy skills—such as group facilitation, reflective practices, grief work, and meaning-making—can support communities beyond religious institutions. Examples of collaborations with climate nonprofits, public health departments, schools, libraries, and community initiatives demonstrate how spiritual care can address burnout, anxiety, ecological grief, and loss of meaning. I argue and present transdisciplinary thinking and creative approaches to chaplaincy are essential for meeting emerging spiritual needs and fostering collective resilience to prepare for our future(s). (AI was used to support summarizing the abstract in a concise manner) 

How is spiritual care evolving in response to human–animal relationships? This paper presents findings from a mixed-methods study that maps the emerging multifaceted field of veterinary chaplaincy, animal chaplaincy, and interspecies spiritual care. Drawing on survey and interview data from 43 chaplains and chaplaincy educators in the United States and Canada, this research foregrounds the voices of chaplains working in a wide range of human-animal contexts, including homes, veterinary practices, animal shelters, wildlife sanctuaries, ecological habitats, and religious institutions. These chaplains provide a range of spiritual care interventions, creating rituals for transitioning animals, offering grief support for caregivers, and companioning animal-care professionals experiencing occupational and moral distress. This dialogical session will focus on key insights from the findings: how practitioners prepare for the work and how they sustain their practice.

This paper agues that healthcare chaplains should become more actively involved in organized labor as part of their vocation and as a strategy for sustaining the future of chaplaincy. Drawing on Catholic social thought, feminist ethics, labor history, and ethnographic interviews with chaplains in healthcare contexts and nurses involved in the 2026 New York City nurses' strike, I develop a pragmatic account of solidarity as both moral virtue, social practice, and professional call. 

Saturday, 3:00 PM - 4:30 PM Session ID: A21-322
Papers Session

What happens to human futures when they are organized around the possibility of contact with beings who are, by definition, unknowable? This panel brings together three scholars working at the intersection of religion, science, and culture to examine how extraterrestrial life and intelligence–scientifically speculated, culturally contested, and personally experienced–function as sites where alternative futures are imagined, struggled over, and made livable. Each paper examines communities operating at the margins of both institutional science and mainstream religion that are nonetheless engaged in urgent, consequential work to open new horizons: epistemically, cosmologically, and therapeutically. Together, the papers illuminate how UFO subcultures, alien abduction communities, and the scientific practices of SETI researchers function as laboratories for the anthropology of the future–spaces where competing imaginations contest the shape of what is possible, who has the authority to say so, and what forms of life will be viable.

Papers

This paper examines how SETI practitioners use game theory, historical analogy, and policy protocols to predict and control the fundamentally unknowable event of contact with extraterrestrial intelligence. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork and analysis of scientific literature, I argue these methods constitute scientific divination that transforms radical uncertainty into managed risk while simultaneously generating new forms of enchantment. Game-theoretical models depend on non-empirical axioms that conjure particular futures into calculable existence. Historical analogies mobilize sanitized colonial narratives as predictive tools, reading futures in the past. Post-detection protocols impose bureaucratic order onto speculative scenarios, promising control without eliminating surprise. Rather than opposing enchantment, these rational methods produce meta-empirical otherness—potential alien presences that structure present action despite their unknowability and speculative nature. SETI's predictive practices are existential technologies for navigating decisions with species-ending consequences, revealing how prediction operates and enchantment intensifies precisely where empirical grounding fails and rationalization appears most complete.

This paper will provide an overview of the lineage of thought, treatment, and community building that anomalous experiencers have engaged with to make meaning of what has happened to them. Drawing from archival research and ethnographic fieldwork, this paper reframes the lives of experiencers, and often their most traumatic moments, not as cultural curiosities but as sites of lived meaning and care within the context of psychiatric history and religious experience.

How do meaning-making strategies surrounding the “UFO phenomenon” intersect with “religion”? This paper explores the call-and-response between mainstream institutional UFO denial and grassroots subcultural knowledge production. The UFO phenomenon and associated notions of non-human intelligence destabilize hegemonic Western paradigms. Those in the UFO community navigate this fraught terrain through four distinguishable truth-seeking orientations: 1) speculative-political, 2) investigative-scientific, 3) communicative-spiritual, and 4) reconstructive-experiential. Symbolic boundaries and appeals to authority, experience, and science position UFO knowledge relative to mainstream institutions. Communicative-spiritual knowledge production, the third mode, is oriented vis-à-vis the spiritual-but-not-religious milieu as well as religious orthodoxies. In the U.S., UFO communities bypass both cautious Catholic openness and fundamentalist Christian demonization of UFOs to improvisationally bricolage Christian, Hindu, Buddhist, esoteric, and New Age elements into UFO-based spiritualities. The paper will conclude with two subcultural case studies of attempts at communication with non-human intelligences and the hierarchies of knowledge thereby reproduced or subverted.