Submitted to Program Units |
---|
1: Mahabharata and Classical Hinduism Seminar |
Abstract for Online Program Book (maximum 150 words)
The three papers in this session all consider issues of human agency and fate in the _Mahābhārata_. Brian Black’s paper compares the two framing dialogues that introduce the story, finding that one places emphasis on the text’s ontological status and universal appeal, and the other on the genealogical history and the divine plan. He argues that the two frames work together to support the _Mahābhārata_’s claim to inclusivity and universality. Veena Howard’s paper highlights Queen Gāndhārī’s perspective, shifting the focus from heroism to the value of bodily existence, sensuality, and love. Tejas Aralere’s paper considers the roles of Draupadī, Dhṛṣṭadyumna, and Śikhaṇḍī. Though perhaps fated to be central figures in the bloody conflict, their actions also contribute to establishing peace from multiple fronts, he argues.
Papers
- Framing the Mahābhārata: How Do Ugraśravas and Vaiśampāyaṇa Characterise the Main Story?
- Queen Gāndhārī’s Mapping the Battlefield through the “Divine Eye:” Reversing the Masculine Gaze and Affirming the Feminine Bodily Reality