You are here

The Implications of Religious Engagement at Policy and Practice Levels in Development

It is in the last 20 years or so that more research on religions and development has emerged. So what is “religions and development”? It is the study of any and all religious beliefs and practices as they relate to people’s work to improve and protect human dignity, wellbeing, and society. This is a wide field, potentially, but in particular, the focus of religions and development research is on the work of international development organizations and their partnerships with faith actors, ranging from small, local faith groups to large faith-based organizations. 

In the early days of this work, religions were mostly ignored in development research. In the 90s and 2000s, this started to reverse, particularly after 9/11, but also building on research and discussion that had been growing in the previous decade. Much of the work at this time was trying to make the case that international development should pay attention to religions. Projects from the World Bank and the UK’s Department of International Development (DfID) provided many case studies showing how religions were already involved in the day-to-day work of development. Books argued that the complexity and nuances of religions must be understood, encouraging engagement with religion “in its entirety and not only to the extent that it is conducive or detrimental to pre-defined development goals.”  

From 2010 to the present, research in religions and development has considerably grown. There are several handbooks and special journal issues on the subject, and now there is a dedicated journal launched in 2022. Research has become increasingly interested in investigating and critiquing religious engagement in international development. Researchers noticed that research in this area had been too focused on how to instrumentally work with religions (i.e., co-opt or use), too focused only on faith-based organizations, which are, in fact, only a small segment of all types of faith actors, and too quick to separate religions from development norms, setting up an us vs. them approach (i.e., religions vs. development). 

There are some common themes in all religions and development evidence so far. Evidence repeatedly shows that religions have assets that are important for development, from the trust and authority of religious leaders and institutions (e.g., 2014-15 Ebola response), to their access to remote locations and groups, their financial clout, and their volunteer and social networks to reach out to a large number and diverse range of people. There is more evidence in some areas, such as health and HIV/AIDS response, since faith-based work in these areas has been prominent for decades (and even centuries in the case of health care provision from religious institutions). The evidence base on religions and development grows stronger every year as more research helps us understand how to improve religious engagement.

This session aims to provoke debate on the state of our field as a whole. The papers in the session interrogate the nuanced nature of FBOs to explain both the positive and negative aspects of their involvement, demonstrate a way to measure the relevance of faith in development work, and explore the roles of young people in religious engagement in high-level policy spaces. These papers show the breadth of research possible within the field of religions and development. As a field with much applied research, they also showcase practical methods and approaches to working with faith actors in development. These papers reflect on the implications of religious engagement at policy and practice levels, from the local to the national and global. 

Abstract for Online Program Book (maximum 150 words)

This session aims to provoke debate on the state of the religions and development field as a whole. The papers in the session interrogate the nuanced nature of FBOs to explain both the positive and negative aspects of their involvement, demonstrate a way to measure the relevance of faith in development work, and explore the roles of young people in religious engagement in high-level policy spaces. These papers show the breadth of research possible within the field of religions and development. As a field with much applied research, they also showcase practical methods and approaches to working with faith actors in development. These papers reflect on the implications of religious engagement at policy and practice levels, from the local to the national and global. 

Papers

  • Abstract

    Paper explores the interactions between religion and development by analyzing the case of the Al-Khidmat Foundation (AKF) in Karachi, Pakistan. Studying AKF, the paper discusses how Faith-Based Organizations (FBOs) draw on religious ideas and practices to conduct social welfare and development projects. I explore the meaning, mission, and characteristics of FBOs, in terms of their religious and political affiliations in Karachi. Findings show the emerging role of faith/religion in community development, as a counterpoint to the modern notions of secularisation. It argues that AKF occupies vantage positions over ‘non-religious’ or mainstream organizations, in terms of resources, enhanced access, and religious legitimacy. However, AKF has also been criticized for its conservative, proselytizing, and political development agendas. Such characteristics contradict the mainstream and secular discourse of development and call for a strategic and nuanced engagement of local faith actors – and therefore religion, into global development.

  • Abstract

    Although world leaders recently reaffirmed commitments to achieving the SDGs, disaggregation of by G7 and G20 yields insights into how policymaking is impacted by population age structures. All G7 countries have older populations. The world population is youthful. The G20 contains a mix of population types. The integration of youth leaders into decision making processes has been promoted to improve SDG implementation because youthful populations are the primary beneficiaries of a sustainable and healthy planet. The interfaith movement has given rise to a youth leader interfaith movement that has produced a set of ten Interfaith Development Goals to compliment, and support the implementation of, the SDGs. A youth climate movement that is rooted in moral identities rather than faith-based identities has emerged from the G7. Interfaith engagement with the G20 would benefit from better integration of youth leaders from both movements to strengthen political will for implementation of the SDGs.

  • Abstract

    Measuring spirituality is complex, involving culture, context, theology, and discernment. This study attempts to validate closed survey questions for predicting spirituality according to the judgment of local leaders. Employing a triangulation approach, it utilizes the assessment of local church leaders, gathered via participant interviews, to categorize individuals according to maturity, providing a benchmark to compare the survey results against. Advanced statistical models were then applied to identify key quantitative survey questions that were best correlated with the local leader categorizations. This methodology situates the ‘decision making’ determination of spiritual maturity into the hands of local voices, and seeks to connect this knowledge to commonly used survey instruments in the field of spiritual measurement.

Audiovisual Requirements

Resources

LCD Projector and Screen
Podium microphone

Other

We want to participate in the online version so none of the above should be needed.

Sabbath Observance

Sunday (all day)

Comments

June Online

Full Papers Available

No
Program Unit Options

Session Length

90 Minutes

Schedule Preference

Tuesday, 8:30 AM - 10:00 AM

Schedule Preference Other

Early
Schedule Info

Tuesday, 11:00 AM - 12:15 PM (June Online Meeting)

Tags

#development #international #global #humanitarian #measurement #interfaith #youth #pakistan
SDGs
interfaith dialogue
youth leadership
G7
G20
G21
Sustainable Development

Session Identifier

AO25-102